About

TV & (pop) cultural theory from turn-of-the-century-style and hostilities.

Search for content

My frustration with the second series of Downtown Abbey is a matter of red herrings, mostly.  How many times in this season were we presented with a shocking possibility regarding injuries or blackmail or impossibilities or long-lost relatives, only to have them cast off—sometimes within the same episode?  The main points of tension in this series, really, were tired remnants from the first series:  covering up the scandal regarding “the Turkish gentleman,” and dealing with Mr. Bates’ wife.
This series covered way too much ground in so few episodes.  I suppose this was a device allowing Matthew to be home on leave just about every episode, but the series felt rushed, hurtling toward the end of the war and the 1920s.  Despite this rapid passage of time, we leave the series in much the same way we found it at the beginning of the first series.  A few characters have come and gone, but there are few major upheavals besides the one that ends the final moments of the last episode—but given what we have seen so far, I cannot feel any real sense of anxiety about how that story line will unfurl.
The lack of consequences on this show, oddly, is a circumstance that really only applies to the “upstairs” half of the cast.  The servants face death, financial ruin, single motherhood, guilt.  I don’t know what message we can take from this; the aristocracy is constant, but humanity lies with The People.
While I always enjoy watching Downton Abbey, and was moved almost to tears several times over the course of the series, I feel that this second go lacked a certain spark that the first series had, which is strange since the first series didn’t take place during a war.  I want to demand tougher decisions, more elegant writing, better dialogue.  I quite like this show but want more from it.  

My frustration with the second series of Downtown Abbey is a matter of red herrings, mostly.  How many times in this season were we presented with a shocking possibility regarding injuries or blackmail or impossibilities or long-lost relatives, only to have them cast off—sometimes within the same episode?  The main points of tension in this series, really, were tired remnants from the first series:  covering up the scandal regarding “the Turkish gentleman,” and dealing with Mr. Bates’ wife.

This series covered way too much ground in so few episodes.  I suppose this was a device allowing Matthew to be home on leave just about every episode, but the series felt rushed, hurtling toward the end of the war and the 1920s.  Despite this rapid passage of time, we leave the series in much the same way we found it at the beginning of the first series.  A few characters have come and gone, but there are few major upheavals besides the one that ends the final moments of the last episode—but given what we have seen so far, I cannot feel any real sense of anxiety about how that story line will unfurl.

The lack of consequences on this show, oddly, is a circumstance that really only applies to the “upstairs” half of the cast.  The servants face death, financial ruin, single motherhood, guilt.  I don’t know what message we can take from this; the aristocracy is constant, but humanity lies with The People.

While I always enjoy watching Downton Abbey, and was moved almost to tears several times over the course of the series, I feel that this second go lacked a certain spark that the first series had, which is strange since the first series didn’t take place during a war.  I want to demand tougher decisions, more elegant writing, better dialogue.  I quite like this show but want more from it.  

(Source: chinderesistance)


(via lucette)